You dont have javascript enabled! Please enable it!
Loading...

Every time I saw Eddie, he’d say, ‘I made you!’, which goes all the way back to Formula 3. I knew of his own racing – he wasn’t a bad driver – and at the end of 1986 I saw him at the Grovewood Awards. He said, ‘Has anyone signed you yet?’ and I said no, so basically on the back of a napkin we did a deal.

He had backing from Stelrad so had about three-quarters of a budget and was able to give me the chance – I had no budget. He had been close to the F3 title before and he was desperate to win it. Obviously he found the right driver! When it did happen you could tell in his body language the lift it gave him. The dream of F1 was there, that’s what he wanted to do.

In F3000 we had no sponsorship. In Spain [at Jerez] for the opening race of 1988 I put it on pole and he rang Camel. They said they’d already done their deals but they agreed to a meeting the following week if I won the race – I think just to get him off the phone! Before the race he went to other teams and got a Camel sticker to put on the car. I won the race, he had his meeting and he got Camel sponsorship for the next two years…

Johnny Herbert, Eddie Jordan Racing Reynard 88D

Johnny Herbert, Eddie Jordan Racing Reynard 88D

Photo by: Motorsport Images

That was Eddie. It didn’t matter to him if a deal was £1.50, it was a deal. What he achieved was impressive and he was refreshing when he came into F1.

He had a strength – the people he had were a part of the family. He was part of theirs and they were part of his. He had an ability to get the best out of people and had people like Bosco Quinn and Andy Stevenson who were important and loyal. It was all the little ingredients that he took all the way to F1.

He was good at giving drivers opportunities, like Michael Schumacher, Damon Hill, and Heinz-Harald Frentzen after his time at Williams. He was always aware of the talent. When Frentzen came it was like a family, like he’d had at Sauber, after the hard time at Williams. You made the driver comfortable. He had an eye for talent and an eye for how to put it together.

He’s left a wonderful legacy. It was a lovely period and it was beautiful to have Eddie in F1.

Read Also:

In this article

Kevin Turner

Formula 1

Johnny Herbert

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Johnny Herbert, who lost his role as an FIA steward last month, has said “certain people” lobbied the FIA over his dismissal.

Last year was Herbert’s 15th as an ex-driver representative to the stewards. The FIA said in a statement they and Herbert “mutually agreed that his duties as an FIA steward and that of a media pundit were incompatible.”

Herbert acknowledged “I was an FIA steward and so it wasn’t deemed to be the right thing for a steward to be able to talk about situations that have happened or have an opinion even on situations that hadn’t happened over a particular race weekend.”

However Herbert believed his position was secure and was surprised to learn of the FIA’s decision to remove him from the position.

“It didn’t come from within the FIA initially,” the former Formula 1 driver told a website promoting a casino. “It was all to do with chitter chatter to the FIA that made them change their point of view.

“Everything I’d done all year long in 2024 had been discussed and accepted. Two days before I was eventually given the sack over the phone, I’d been told all was good for 2025. Then it wasn’t.

“I understand how everything came about. But I am not going to point the finger. But as I said, there were certain people who did actually speak with the president [of the FIA] and that’s why the president finally made that decision to get rid of me.”

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Although Herbert said he is “absolutely fine” with the decision now, he admitted “it was upsetting at the time because I enjoyed it, and I felt that I was doing the best job and with no bias towards anybody.”

Herbert rejected claims he favoured British drivers with his decisions. “I had rules and guidelines that I had to deal with, not on my own, but with three other FIA stewards as well,” he explained.

“I don’t think I was doing anything that was favouring anybody. I only did what I thought was necessary. If it was Lewis [Hamilton], if it was Max [Verstappen], if it was Lando [Norris], or any of the drivers on the racetrack.

“I had no bitterness towards any of those drivers to decide, ‘well, I don’t like him, so I’m going to give him a penalty just because.’ That’s not how it works, and it never will work like that.

“That’s where I felt that the way it was aimed at me, accusing me of bias, was absolutely ridiculous. But that’s where there has been this continual British bias talk for some reason, and I don’t get it.”

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Herbert was part of the FIA’s stewarding team at eight rounds last year including the Austrian and Mexican grands prix, which saw contentious incidents involving Max Verstappen and Lando Norris. Verstappen was penalised on both occasions.

Herbert said Verstappen and his father Jos, who is also a former F1 driver, have accused him of bias.

“The Verstappens keep intimating there’s a bias,” he said. “I keep reading about the supposed bias. I read that and then wonder, ‘So I can’t support a British driver because I’m British?’

“I can’t support Lewis or George [Russell] or Lando. It’s ridiculous. But coming the other way is fine apparently as was the case in what happened with me.

“If you’re a Dutchman, you can sort of have a go at the Brits and say the Brits have got no real morals for how they are as race fans. It’s supposed to go both ways isn’t it.”

Miss nothing from RaceFans

Get a daily email with all our latest stories – and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Formula 1

Browse all Formula 1 articles

Sacked FIA race steward Johnny Herbert has taken aim at Formula 1’s governing body and hit back at accusations of bias.

Herbert was dropped as an F1 steward one month ago after the FIA decided his “duties as a steward and that of a media pundit were incompatible”.

The shock announcement came after he found himself at the centre of a row involving world champion Max Verstappen and his father Jos. Herbert was on the body of stewards that presided over last year’s Mexico Grand Prix, where the Red Bull driver was given two 10-second penalties for two incidents with McLaren’s Lando Norris.

It sparked accusations from Jos Verstappen that “the FIA should take a good look at the staffing of the stewards, who they put there and whether there is no appearance of a conflict of interest”.

Speaking to CasinoApps.com, Herbert said: “Certain people spoke to [FIA president] Mohammed Ben Sulayem about sacking me. It didn’t come from within the FIA initially. It was all to do with chitter-chatter to the FIA that made them change their point of view.

“Everything I’d done all year long in 2024 had been discussed and accepted.

“Two days before I was eventually given the sack over the phone, I’d been told all was good for 2025. Then it wasn’t.

Johnny Herbert

Johnny Herbert

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

“I understand how everything came about. But I am not going to point the finger. But as I said, there were certain people who did actually speak with the president and that’s why the president finally made that decision to get rid of me.”

Reflecting on the decision and accusations of British bias, Herbert added: “The Verstappens keep intimating there’s a bias.

“I keep reading about the supposed bias. I read that and then wonder, ‘so I can’t support a British driver because I’m British?’ I can’t support Lewis or George or Lando. It’s ridiculous.

“But coming the other way is fine apparently as was the case in what happened with me.

“If you’re a Dutchman, you can sort of have a go at the Brits and say the Brits have got no real morals for how they are as race fans. It’s supposed to go both ways isn’t it.

“I’m absolutely fine with [parting ways with the FIA]. It was upsetting at the time because I enjoyed it, and I felt that I was doing the best job and with no bias towards anybody.”

Herbert has also weighed in on claims that Ben Sulayem demanded members of the world motorsport council signed non-disclosure agreements, after British duo Robert Reid and David Richards were barred from a meeting on Wednesday after refusing to sign NDAs.

Herbert accused the FIA of being “more controlling” and having a “heavy-handed” approach. He said: “The FIA are more controlling than before and now have a heavy-handed way of dealing with things. There does seem to be a more controlling factor coming into play.

David Richards and Mohammed Ben Sulayem, President, FIA

David Richards and Mohammed Ben Sulayem, President, FIA

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

“Dave Richards was one of those who refused to sign an NDA and therefore wasn’t allowed into the room for the World Motor Sport Council meeting earlier this week.

“Dave’s been around the world for many a decade [as a former British American Racing team principal who also heads Motorsport UK] and a big part of the FIA at the same time.

“Signing an NDA and confidentiality agreements is not the norm, but it’s becoming the norm. There definitely seems to be a more heavy-handed way of dealing with things now.”

In this article

Ben Hunt

Formula 1

Johnny Herbert

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Sacked FIA race steward Johnny Herbert has taken aim at Formula 1’s governing body and hit back at accusations of bias.

Herbert was dropped as an F1 steward one month ago after the FIA decided his “duties as a steward and that of a media pundit were incompatible”.

The shock announcement came after he found himself at the centre of a row involving world champion Max Verstappen and his father Jos. Herbert was on the body of stewards that presided over last year’s Mexico Grand Prix where the Red Bull driver was given two 10-second penalties for two incidents with McLaren’s Lando Norris.

It sparked accusations from Jos Verstappen that “the FIA should take a good look at the staffing of the stewards, who they put there and whether there is no appearance of a conflict of interest”.

Speaking to CasinoApps.com, Herbert said: “Certain people spoke to [FIA president] Mohammed Ben Sulayem about sacking me. It didn’t come from within the FIA initially. It was all to do with chitter chatter to the FIA that made them change their point of view.

“Everything I’d done all year long in 2024 had been discussed and accepted.

“Two days before I was eventually given the sack over the phone, I’d been told all was good for 2025. Then it wasn’t.

Johnny Herbert

Johnny Herbert

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

“I understand how everything came about. But I am not going to point the finger. But as I said, there were certain people who did actually speak with the president and that’s why the president finally made that decision to get rid of me.”

Reflecting on the decision and accusations of British bias, Herbert added: “The Verstappens keep intimating there’s a bias.

“I keep reading about the supposed bias. I read that and then wonder, ‘so I can’t support a British driver because I’m British?’ I can’t support Lewis or George or Lando. It’s ridiculous.

“But coming the other way is fine apparently as was the case in what happened with me.

“If you’re a Dutchman, you can sort of have a go at the Brits and say the Brits have got no real morals for how they are as race fans. It’s supposed to go both ways isn’t it.

“I’m absolutely fine with [parting ways with the FIA]. It was upsetting at the time because I enjoyed it, and I felt that I was doing the best job and with no bias towards anybody.”

Herbert has also weighed in on claims that Ben Sulayem demanded members of the world motorsport council signed non-disclosure agreements, after British duo Robert Reid and David Richards were barred from a meeting on Wednesday after refusing to sign NDAs.

Herbert accused the FIA of being “more controlling” and having a “heavy-handed” approach. He said: “The FIA are more controlling than before and now have a heavy-handed way of dealing with things. There does seem to be a more controlling factor coming into play.

David Richards and Mohammed Ben Sulayem, President, FIA

David Richards and Mohammed Ben Sulayem, President, FIA

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

“Dave Richards was one of those who refused to sign an NDA and therefore wasn’t allowed into the room for the World Motor Sport Council meeting earlier this week.

“Dave’s been around the world for many a decade [as a former British American Racing team principal who also heads Motorsport UK] and a big part of the FIA at the same time.

“Signing an NDA and confidentiality agreements is not the norm, but it’s becoming the norm. There definitely seems to be a more heavy-handed way of dealing with things now.”

In this article

Ben Hunt

Formula 1

Johnny Herbert

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Red Bull team boss Christian Horner says Formula 1’s governing body the FIA was right to part ways with steward Johnny Herbert.

On Wednesday the FIA stated that Herbert, a long-time driver steward as the veteran of 160 grand prix starts, would no longer act as a steward at grand prix weekends.

The FIA felt Herbert’s media activities, especially those as a pundit for gambling websites, were incompatible with the role of a steward.

“Johnny is widely respected and brought invaluable experience and expertise to his role,” the FIA communicated. “However, after discussion, it was mutually agreed that his duties as an FIA steward and that of a media pundit were incompatible.”

Red Bull chief Horner, whose driver Max Verstappen was regularly at odds with Herbert last year, said the 60-year-old’s removal was the correct decision, though refuting suggestions Verstappen had anything to do with the matter.

“Well, firstly, absolutely nothing to do with Max, but absolutely the right decision,” Horner told Sky Sports F1 at the Autosport Awards in London. “You cannot have stewards working in the media. You don’t have it in the Premiership. You don’t have any other form of professional sport. It’s totally inappropriate.

“You’re either on the sporting regulatory side or you’re on the media side. You can’t have a foot in both camps.”

Oracle Red Bull Racing Team Principal Christian Horner

Oracle Red Bull Racing Team Principal Christian Horner

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

Verstappen’s father Jos had also been critical of Herbert’s dual roles, saying “a steward shouldn’t talk to the press at all”, while Herbert felt there was no conflict of interest between his different activities.

“I am Johnny Herbert the steward and the professional during a race weekend and Johnny Herbert a pundit at other times, who expresses what he thinks,” he said in November. “When I do speak to people on a Monday or Tuesday that is outside my stewarding responsibilities.”

Herbert’s dismissal for taking on punditry gigs further highlighted a desire by many in the sport for FIA stewards to become full-time professionals instead of relying on part-time volunteers, a stance taken by McLaren CEO Zak Brown.

“To have part-time, unpaid stewards in a multi-billion-dollar sport where everything is on the line to make the right call… I don’t think we are set up for success by not having full-time stewards,” Brown said at the Autosport Business Exchange: London.

“As far as paying for the stewards, this will probably be unpopular amongst my fellow teams. I’m happy if McLaren and all the racing teams contribute. It’s so important for the sport. It can’t be that expensive if everybody contributes. It’s not going to break the bank.”

Read Also:

Brown also felt stewards should be given the scope to show more leniency as they interpret the racing rules, which came under intense scrutiny in 2024 as Verstappen and Lando Norris battled in Austin and Mexico.

“The individuals are fine but the rulebook is too restrictive,” he added. “I’d like us to take a step back, loosen it up. Have full-time stewards who can make more of a subjective decision of whether that was right or wrong.”

In this article

Filip Cleeren

Formula 1

Johnny Herbert

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Red Bull team principal Christian Horner strongly endorsed the FIA’s decision to part ways with Johnny Herbert, who has served as an advisor to the stewards since 2010.

The FIA announced this week it had mutually parted ways with Herbert as his work was “incompatible” with his media role. Herbert has commented on his role as a steward in quotes supplied to gambling websites, which offer them to media.

One such quote was distributed following last year’s Austrian Grand Prix, in which the panel that Herbert was on gave Max Verstappen a 10-second time penalty for causing a collision. Herbert explained this was the “hardest” penalty available for his collision with Lando Norris.

Horner denied any link between Herbert’s ousting and Verstappen, but said his departure is the right move.

“It’s absolutely nothing to do with Max, but absolutely the right decision,” Horner told Sky. “You cannot have stewards working in the media.

“You don’t have it in the premiership [football league], you don’t have it in any other form of professional sport, it’s totally inappropriate. You’re either on the sporting, regulatory side or you’re on the media side. You can’t have a foot in both camps.”

The FIA rotates its four stewards from race to race. Herbert was one of four ex-drivers who performed the role and covered one-third of last year’s 24 rounds.

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

However some in F1, such as McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown, believe the FIA should use the same stewards at every round.

“We’re in a multi-billion dollar sport, a lot on the line, stewarding is not easy,” he said. “I think you need to have full-time stewards, they need to be paid.”

Brown believes having the same stewards every weekend would allow the FIA to loosen aspects of the regulations and allow for a greater degree of interpretation.

“We need to look at the rule book, I think it’s a bit too prescriptive,” he said. “And if you get some stewards in full time, give them a little bit more leniency, they know what’s right and wrong versus this ‘race to the apex’ stuff because it’s a bit too prescriptive and it’s just taking a little bit of the racing out of it. So I think it’ll be fixed.”

Miss nothing from RaceFans

Get a daily email with all our latest stories – and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:

Formula 1

Browse all Formula 1 articles