Aero-elasticity continues to be a hot topic in Formula 1 in the wake of the FIA announcing more stringent tests on rear wings to detect if they are flexing under load. So naturally there has been an immediate presumption of guilt when the governing body circulated a report from technical delegate Jo Bauer that he was referring Williams to the stewards for failing to supply camera footage of its wings within an hour of practice ending in China.

The team has yet to explain this failure.

It’s easy to infer guilt from this, but impossible to prove it; there may be an innocent explanation. It’s also impossible to be certain that a wing is illegal simply by looking at video footage of it.

You don’t have to dig far on social media to see individuals sharing in-car footage of wings appearing to flex and claiming – often in hysterical tones – that this is a smoking gun which needs to be acted upon. In fact, it’s perfectly natural for wings to deflect under load, and impossible to prevent completely – the question is how much has been deliberately engineered and to what end.

The only practical way to measure the exact degree a wing flexes under load is to do it at rest, by applying weights. Even this isn’t quite like-for-like, hence the recent changing of the permitted tolerance in the rear-wing tests.

F1 teams have been exploiting static measurements for decades. In the previous ground-effect era the FIA tried to clamp down on it by imposing a minimum ride height, which could of course only be measured when the car was at rest.

Haas VF-24 rear wing detail

Haas VF-24 rear wing detail

Photo by: Andreas Beil

Brabham’s Gordon Murray was the first to circumvent this, fitting the bodywork of his car on pneumatic struts which kept the side skirts at the legal height when stationary, but compressed under load.

The FIA’s purpose in introducing new video checks at the Belgian Grand Prix last year was to find some way of indicating scientifically the degree to which a wing is flexing under real aerodynamic loads. High-definition cameras facing frontwards and rearwards were trained on the front and rear wings, which carried dots on the endplates so the FIA could examine the extent to which wing elements were rotating.

At the moment these cameras are only used during free practice sessions (which of course opens up the potential for teams to swap in components that are on the ragged edge of legality for qualifying and races). It’s understood that examination of various cars’ onboard footage during FP1 in Australia was the prompt for the latest change in the testing regime.

But Williams hasn’t been found to have broken any technical regulations. This is merely a procedural breach of a Technical Directive, and in any case there would have been no expectation to provide footage from sprint qualifying in China.

Also, the technical delegate’s report didn’t say that Williams hadn’t provided the footage at all, simply that it had failed to supply it within the given deadline of one hour after practice ends.

That’s likely to be why the stewards elected to delay the hearing until Saturday morning in Shanghai: this is not a case which needs to be heard urgently.

Read Also:

But it does need to be heard, because if Williams is seen to go unpunished for such a breach, other teams would feel that they can fail to provide footage and escape sanction. That would undermine the entire philosophy of subjecting them to (almost) constant scrutiny.

So, even if there is an innocent explanation for failing to provide the footage by the specified deadline, and no technical regulations have been broken, some punishment is inevitable. The question, given the unprecedented nature of this affair, is the severity.

In this article

Stuart Codling

Formula 1

Carlos Sainz

Alex Albon

Williams

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Aero-elasticity continues to be a hot topic in Formula 1 in the wake of the FIA announcing more stringent tests on rear wings to detect if they are flexing under load. So naturally there has been an immediate presumption of guilt when the governing body circulated a report from technical delegate Jo Bauer that he was referring Williams to the stewards for failing to supply camera footage of its wings within an hour of practice ending in China.

The team has yet to explain this failure.

It’s easy to infer guilt from this, but impossible to prove it. There may be an innocent explanation.

It’s also impossible to be certain that a wing is illegal simply by looking at video footage of it.

You don’t have to dig far on social media to see individuals sharing in-car footage of wings appearing to flex and claiming – often in hysterical tones – that this is a smoking gun which needs to be acted upon. In fact, it’s perfectly natural for wings to deflect under load, and impossible to prevent completely – the question is how much has been deliberately engineered and to what end.

The only practical way to measure the exact degree a wing flexes under load is to do it at rest, by applying weights. Even this isn’t quite like-for-like, hence the recent changing of the permitted tolerance in the rear-wing tests.

F1 teams have been exploiting static measurements for decades. In the previous ground effect era the FIA tried to clamp down on it by imposing a minimum ride height, which could of course only be measured when the car was at rest.

Haas VF-24 rear wing detail

Haas VF-24 rear wing detail

Photo by: Andreas Beil

Brabham’s Gordon Murray was the first to circumvent this, fitting the bodywork of his car on pneumatic struts which kept the side skirts at the legal height when stationary, but compressed under load.

The FIA’s purpose in introducing new video checks at the Belgian Grand Prix last year was to find some way of indicating scientifically the degree to which a wing is flexing under real aerodynamic loads. High-definition cameras facing frontwards and rearwards were trained on the front and rear wings, which carried dots on the endplates so the FIA could examine the extent to which wing elements were rotating.

At the moment these cameras are only used during free practice sessions (which of course opens up the potential for teams to swap in components that are on the ragged edge of legality for qualifying and races). It’s understood that examination of various cars’ onboard footage during FP1 in Australia was the prompt for the latest change in the testing regime.

But Williams hasn’t been found to have broken any technical regulations. This is merely a procedural breach of a Technical Directive, and in any case there would have been no expectation to provide footage from sprint qualifying in China.

Also, the technical delegate’s report didn’t say that Williams hadn’t provided the footage at all, simply that it had failed to supply it within the given deadline of one hour after practice ends.

That’s likely to be why the stewards elected to delay the hearing until Saturday morning in Shanghai: this is not a case which needs to be heard urgently.

Read Also:

But it does need to be heard, because if Williams is seen to go unpunished for such a breach, other teams would feel that they can fail to provide footage and escape sanction. That would undermine the entire philosophy of subjecting them to (almost) constant scrutiny.

So, even if there is an innocent explanation for failing to provide the footage by the specified deadline, and no technical regulations have been broken, some punishment is inevitable. The question, given the unprecedented nature of this affair, is the severity.

In this article

Stuart Codling

Formula 1

Carlos Sainz

Alex Albon

Williams

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Carlos Sainz admits he still does not feel at home in the cockpit of his Williams Formula 1 car after a disappointing showing in Chinese Grand Prix sprint qualifying.

The Spaniard joined Williams from Ferrari over the winter and set the pace in pre-season testing before crashing behind the safety car during the Australian Grand Prix last weekend.

Sainz, with four grand prix victories to his name, could only manage 13th place on the grid for Saturday’s sprint race in Shanghai – in contrast to team-mate Alex Albon, who progressed into the top 10 – and conceded he is still learning his new surroundings.

Read Also:

“I’ve struggled all day with the balance, and both sessions have been quite tough,” Sainz said.

“In sprint quali we had a few issues, including a weird feeling with the seat that we’ll look into, but overall it comes down to me still not feeling at home in the car.

“We were struggling with some balance problems and especially coming down to Q2, not knowing exactly where to find the lap time and a bit of overdriving.

Carlos Sainz, Williams

Carlos Sainz, Williams

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

“I still have to learn and understand many things about it and I know, with more mileage, it will come. Hopefully tomorrow we can put everything together and improve today’s result for Sunday.

“It’s been a difficult weekend up until now, we’re trying to find the balance of the car, it feels quite different here with the wind and, as I said, I’m struggling to find lap time when it comes to qualifying.”

Albon believes tyre degradation could play a pivotal role during the sprint race given that many teams seem to be struggling with temperatures.

“Tyres are not that easy to know what to do with them. I think the tyres have been – we’ve seen it this year so far – very sensitive, and long corners like they are in China tend to make the tyres work a bit harder,” he said.

“It’s hard to get them into a good place so we’ll do some work overnight and try and get back stronger tomorrow.

“I think graining is going to be a big talking point, the front especially, which is what’s been hard in low fuel as well but in high fuel it gets out of control.

“So I think it’s going to be a very managed race, unfortunately it might look a bit boring in the first few laps and then you’ll see a bit of a race towards the end.”

In this article

Mark Mann-Bryans

Formula 1

Carlos Sainz

Williams

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Carlos Sainz admits he still does not feel at home in the cockpit of his Williams Formula 1 car after a disappointing showing in Chinese Grand Prix sprint qualifying.

The Spaniard joined Williams from Ferrari over the winter and set the pace in pre-season testing before crashing behind the safety car during the Australian Grand Prix last weekend.

Sainz, with four grand prix victories to his name, could only manage 13th place on the grid for Saturday’s sprint race in Shanghai – in contrast to team-mate Alex Albon, who progressed into the top 10 – and conceded he is still learning his new surroundings.

“I’ve struggled all day with the balance and both sessions have been quite tough,” Sainz said.

“In sprint quali we had a few issues, including a weird feeling with the seat that we’ll look into, but overall it comes down to me still not feeling at home in the car.

“We were struggling with some balance problems and especially coming down to Q2, not knowing exactly where to find the lap time and a bit of over-driving.

Carlos Sainz, Williams

Carlos Sainz, Williams

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

“I still have to learn and understand many things about it and I know, with more mileage, it will come.

“Hopefully tomorrow we can put everything together and improve today’s result for Sunday.

“It’s been a difficult weekend up until now, we’re trying to find the balance of the car, it feels quite different here with the wind and, as I said, I’m struggling to find lap time when it comes to qualifying.”

Albon believes tyre degradation could play a pivotal role during the sprint race given that many teams seem to be struggling with temperatures.

“Tyres are not that easy to know what to do with them, I think the tyres have been, we’ve seen it this year so far, very sensitive and long corners like they are in China tend to make the tyres work a bit harder,” he said.

“It’s hard to get them into a good place so we’ll do some work overnight and try and get back stronger tomorrow.

“I think graining is going to be a big talking point, the front especially, which is what’s been hard in low fuel as well but in high fuel it gets out of control.

“So I think it’s going to be a very managed race, unfortunately it might look a bit boring in the first few laps and then you’ll see a bit of a race towards the end.”

In this article

Mark Mann-Bryans

Formula 1

Carlos Sainz

Williams

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Red Bull was worried it wouldn’t make the front two rows for the Chinese Grand Prix sprint after woeful tyre wear in practice, says advisor Helmut Marko.

The team came away from Australia’s season opener with confirmation that main rival McLaren is a step ahead in pace and tyre wear, and there was further proof in the sole practice session for Shanghai’s sprint weekend that Red Bull has a few weaknesses to solve.

Verstappen finished 16th in FP1 with Lawson 18th, and while Red Bull never tends to use powerful engine modes in practice sessions there was genuine worry about its lack of performance.

The Dutchman still looked some way off in SQ1 and SQ2, but in the top ten shootout he pulled a lap out of the bag that netted second, and was only 0.018s shy of the sprint pole set by Ferrari’s Lewis Hamilton.

Read Also:

Verstappen’s second starting berth came as a surprise to the team, with Marko admitting Red Bull hadn’t expected to keep any McLaren or Ferrari car off the front two rows.

“It was much better than expected,” Marko told Motorsport.com. “We were really worried about being able to make the first two rows. They changed several things on the car, which obviously helped as well, and then a mega lap from Max.”

Expanding on Red Bull’s practice woes, the Austrian said: “It was very tricky. We were not in the top six, and the tyre wear was horrendous. So, I hope tomorrow we can see the speed for the whole distance, but this was a very positive surprise.

“We hope that with these changes the tyre wear will also dramatically improve. The sprint is 19 laps, which is quite a lot, but we feel positive.”

Marko said Red Bull’s second driver Liam Lawson deserved “more time” after a costly mistake left the New Zealander last on the grid, while there was praise for an “unbelievable achievement” from Hamilton to grab a sprint pole on his second qualifying run aboard a Ferrari.

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

Marko also applauded the performances by Racing Bulls drivers Yuki Tsunoda (P8) and Isack Hadjar (P15), after having come under fire for his comments on Hadjar’s tearful Australian GP exit last week.

“They did a very smart thing,” he said. “Yuki got a slipstream from Hadjar, who had a wobble, so his lap was destroyed anyway, so it was technically very good. Yuki is in the form of his life so far, and Isack didn’t know this circuit, so he did very well.”

In this article

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

The rolling cheers were the first clue. Reverberating as if sprint qualifying for Formula 1’s Chinese Grand Prix was taking place within a leisure centre swimming pool – such is the way the Shanghai track’s giant main grandstand traps noise – was the noise that greeted Lewis Hamilton’s first Ferrari pole.

At this stage, there was still Max Verstappen left to run as Autosport continued peeking through the trackside catch fencing as the sun began to set behind the long Turn 3 – the end of one of two ‘snail-shaped’ complexes at this track, as nicknamed by the event organisers.

The Red Bull driver wound up just 0.018s adrift of Hamilton’s leading 1m30.849s – largely thanks to Verstappen being alone of the frontrunners to avoid overstressing his rear tyres in the long Turn 13 left that feeds onto the back straight – and he was warmly applauded by the Shanghai crowd for his efforts.

But, for much of what this writer observed, it was the Ferrari that stood out from the rest in terms of car handling. And not in a good way.

Plenty else caught the eye first. How Yuki Tsunoda and Isack Hadjar repeatedly got tighter onto Turn 2’s apex kerbs, which was unsettling the Racing Bulls VCARB 02 when on flying laps, with Fernando Alonso doing similar at Turn 3.

For the Aston Martin driver, this seemed to have a knock-on effect for his subsequent power delivery, as his Mercedes engine burbled uniquely from the rest as the AMR25 oscillated significantly through the early phase of the long left-hander.

Trackside view

Trackside view

Photo by: Alex Kalinauckas

Here, Liam Lawson and Verstappen were taking similarly wide lines through SQ1, where the New Zealander was eliminated. But Lawson needed repeated steering input stabs to keep the nose rotating, whereas Verstappen was smooth and holding speed all the way around.

The difference was a massive 0.5s in the first sector on their respective fastest runs of Friday afternoon’s session – suggesting Lawson was missing momentum all the way down to the Turn 6 hairpin as a result, but with the caveat that he never got as far as using the softs in SQ3.

The McLaren drivers looked strongest here overall – although as they were still getting their tyres up to temperature, Norris was regularly grappling with the front axle in the short squirt as Turn 2 quickly unwinds into Turn 3, compared to team-mate Oscar Piastri.

It is, after all, the lap’s later corners that doomed Norris on Friday – as he was improving rapidly before his Turn 14 lock-up and off that leaves him starting sixth for this weekend’s first race.

On both of their attempts in Q3 the MCL39 drivers had no issue rotating the front, but, unlike the two Mercedes cars, they are having no problem on traction early in Turn 3 either.

On his sole lap in SQ3, Andrea Kimi Antonelli had to step off the gas catching a lurid rear end snap – something George Russell avoids and possibly as a result of him having done this back in SQ1.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

But the Ferrari cars are just different every time they come through – the inconsistency is what stands out when compared F1’s other top teams and this was the case back in Bahrain testing too.

The SF-25 was always shifting for both Hamilton and Charles Leclerc, but at different points in this complex – although the movement was more noticeable on the mediums the drivers ran in SQ1 and SQ2.

For both Ferrari drivers, they were struggling to get on the power as early as the McLarens without their tails snapping right.

But, come the soft tyre run, it is only Hamilton that has a wobble – albeit much earlier in the corner just past the apex and, in any case, it hinders him little.

This still ends up being his best day overall since joining Ferrari at the start of this still-young 2025 season and sets up an intriguing grid for the campaign’s first sprint race.

Read Also:

In this article

Alex Kalinauckas

Formula 1

Ferrari

Red Bull Racing

McLaren

Mercedes

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

The rolling cheers were the first clue. Reverberating as if sprint qualifying for Formula 1’s Chinese Grand Prix was taking place within a leisure-centre swimming pool – such is the way the Shanghai track’s giant main grandstand traps noise – was the noise that greeted Lewis Hamilton’s first Ferrari pole.

At this stage, there was still Max Verstappen left to run as Motorsport.com continued peeking through the trackside catch-fencing as the sun began to set behind the long Turn 3 – the end of one of two ‘snail-shaped’ complexes at this track, as nicknamed by the event organisers.

The Red Bull driver wound up just 0.018s adrift of Hamilton’s leading 1m30.849s – largely thanks to Verstappen being alone of the frontrunners to avoid overstressing his rear tyres in the long Turn 13 left that feeds onto the back straight – and he was warmly applauded by the Shanghai crowd for his efforts.

But, for much of what this writer observed, it was the Ferrari that stood out from the rest in terms of car handling. And not in a good way.

Plenty else caught the eye first. How Yuki Tsunoda and Isack Hadjar repeatedly got tighter onto Turn 2’s apex kerbs, which was unsettling the Racing Bulls VCARB 02 when on flying laps, with Fernando Alonso doing similar at Turn 3.

Trackside view

Trackside view

Photo by: Alex Kalinauckas

For the Aston Martin driver, this seemed to have a knock-on effect on his subsequent power delivery, with his Mercedes engine uniquely burbling from the rest as the AMR25 oscillated significantly through the early phase of the long left-hander.

Here, Liam Lawson and Verstappen were taking similarly wide lines through SQ1, where the New Zealander was eliminated. But Lawson needed repeated steering input stabs to keep the nose rotating, whereas Verstappen was smooth and holding speed all the way around.

The difference was a massive 0.5s in the first sector on their respective fastest runs of Friday afternoon’s session – suggesting Lawson was missing momentum all the way down to the Turn 6 hairpin as a result, but with the caveat that he never got as far as using the softs in SQ3.

The McLaren drivers looked strongest here overall – although as they were still getting their tyres up to temperature, Norris was regularly grappling with the front axle in the short squirt as Turn 2 quickly unwinds into Turn 3, compared to team-mate Oscar Piastri.

It is, after all, the lap’s later corners that doomed Norris on Friday – as he was improving rapidly before his Turn 14 lock-up and off that leaves him starting sixth for this weekend’s first race.

On both of their attempts in Q3 the MCL39 drivers had no issue rotating the front, but, unlike the two Mercedes cars, they are having no problem on traction early in Turn 3 either.

Read Also:

On his sole lap In SQ3, Andrea Kimi Antonelli had to step off the gas catching a lurid rear-end snap – something George Russell avoids, and possibly as a result of him having done this notably back in SQ1.

But the Ferrari cars are just different every time they come through – the inconsistency is what stands out when compared to F1’s other top four teams, and this was the case back in Bahrain testing too.

The SF-25 was always shifting for both Hamilton and Charles Leclerc, but at different points in this complex – although the movement is more noticeable on the mediums the drivers ran in SQ1 and SQ2.

Both Ferrari drivers were struggling to get on the power as early as the McLarens without their tails snapping right. But, come the soft-tyre run, it is only Hamilton that has a wobble – albeit much earlier in the corner just past the apex and, in any case, it hinders him little.

This still ends up being his best day overall since joining Ferrari at the start of this still-young 2025 season and sets up an intriguing grid for the campaign’s first sprint race.

In this article

Alex Kalinauckas

Formula 1

Ferrari

Red Bull Racing

Mercedes

McLaren

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Liam Lawson put his Chinese Grand Prix sprint qualifying woes down to an inability to cool his tyres enough for his final flying lap, leading to him propping up the rest of the Formula 1 field.

The New Zealander was up to 10th after the opening runs, having opened with a 1m32.729s time, but his second attempt was aborted – and ultimately deleted – after running wide at Turn 9 and surpassing track limits.

Read Also:

Lawson had visibly struggled with grip over the session and had been unable to get his medium tyre temperatures down enough during his cool-down laps for his final attempt.

This left him to wrestle the car through the opening corners, notably using a lot of steering lock to get the car into the corners, before running aground towards the end of the second sector.

Lawson’s struggles were in contrast to team-mate Max Verstappen, who came within a couple of hundredths of knocking Lewis Hamilton off top spot.

“I went off, so yeah, it’s obviously a shame,” Lawson lamented after the session. “I think from the starting point it wasn’t too bad; the first lap was alright, and then we were just looking to build on there, but we stayed out to try to cool the tyres on track.

“To be honest, I really struggled to get the temps down, starting the second lap, so we started too hot and then through the lap I just struggled. It’s frustrating.

“It’s really a shame because I think honestly we started OK in quali – first lap wasn’t amazing, but it was relatively OK, so it’s just a shame to be out for something so frustrating. Our pace should be a lot further up than where we are.

Liam Lawson, Red Bull Racing

Liam Lawson, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

“Obviously we have tomorrow’s sprint race to try and learn some stuff and then tomorrow’s quali as well, obviously. We want to do a better job on this.”

GPS data shows that, in their opening SQ1 laps, Lawson had been relatively even with Verstappen until the final sector; the Dutchman’s better exit from Turn 12 helped gather more pace along the 1.2km back straight, and he then braked earlier for the low-speed Turn 14 to gather stronger exits from the final corners.

Lawson was much less certain on the throttle as a result, yielding a 0.4s gap between them after their first laps of the session. However, Lawson was unable to post anything slightly more representative due to his Turn 9 off on his final lap as Verstappen found another three tenths; improvements from the other drivers ensured the Kiwi continued to tumble down the order.

Red Bull adviser Helmut Marko elected not to criticise Lawson’s efforts, stating that the former RB driver needed more time to prove himself – particularly given his lack of knowledge of the opening two circuits on the 2025 calendar.

“He started OK with his first quali run and then unfortunately he lost it and he did have only one lap,” Helmut Marko told Autosport’s sister publication, Motorsport.com’s Dutch edition.

“Yeah, it’s sad, but he needs some laps and he must get in a rhythm to show his potential.

“I think we have to give him more time. Both circuits, he didn’t know, Melbourne and this one. So we’re looking forward and of course first, next to Max, it looks also that our car is quite difficult to drive.”

Additional reporting by Ronald Vording

In this article

Jake Boxall-Legge

Formula 1

Liam Lawson

Red Bull Racing

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Liam Lawson put his Chinese Grand Prix sprint qualifying woes down to an inability to cool his tyres enough for his final flying lap, leading to him propping up the rest of the Formula 1 field.

The New Zealander was up to 10th in the order after the opening runs, having opened with a 1m32.729s time, but his second attempt at a run was aborted – and ultimately deleted – after running wide at Turn 9 and surpassing track limits.

Read Also:

Lawson had visibly struggled with grip over the session and had been unable to get his medium tyre temperatures down enough during his cool-down laps for his final attempt.

This left him to wrestle the car through the opening corners, notably using a lot of steering lock to get the car into the corners, before running aground towards the end of the second sector.

“I went off, so yeah, it’s obviously a shame,” Lawson lamented after the session. “I think from the starting point it wasn’t too bad; the first lap was alright, and then we were just looking to build on there, but we stayed out to try to cool the tyres on track.

“To be honest, I really struggled to get the temps down, starting the second lap, so we started too hot and then through the lap I just struggled. It’s frustrating.

“It’s really a shame because I think honestly we started OK in quali – first lap wasn’t amazing, but it was relatively OK, so it’s just a shame to be out for something so frustrating. Our pace should be a lot further up than where we are.

Liam Lawson, Red Bull Racing

Liam Lawson, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

“Obviously we have tomorrow’s sprint race to try and learn some stuff and then tomorrow’s quali as well, obviously. We want to do a better job on this.”

GPS data shows that, in their opening SQ1 laps, Lawson had been relatively even with Verstappen until the final sector; the Dutchman’s better exit from Turn 12 helped gather more pace along the 1.2km back straight, and he then braked earlier for the low-speed Turn 14 to gather stronger exits from the final corners.

Lawson was much less certain on the throttle as a result, yielding a 0.4s gap between them after their first laps of the session. However, Lawson was unable to post anything slightly more representative due to his Turn 9 off on his final lap as Verstappen found another three tenths; improvements from the other drivers ensured the Kiwi continued to tumble down the order.

Read Also:

Red Bull adviser Helmut Marko elected not to criticise Lawson’s efforts, stating that the former RB driver needed more time to prove himself – particularly given his lack of knowledge of the opening two circuits on the 2025 calendar.

“He started OK with his first quali run and then unfortunately he lost it and he did have only one lap,” Helmut Marko told Motorsport.com Netherlands.

“Yeah, it’s sad, but he needs some laps and he must get in a rhythm to show his potential.

“I think we have to give him more time. Both circuits, he didn’t know, Melbourne and this one. So we’re looking forward and of course first, next to Max, it looks also that our car is quite difficult to drive.”

Additional reporting by Ronald Vording

Photos from Chinese GP – Practice & Sprint QU

 

In this article

Jake Boxall-Legge

Formula 1

Liam Lawson

Red Bull Racing

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Lando Norris admitted his own mistakes left the early Formula 1 championship leader qualifying down in sixth for the sprint race at the Chinese Grand Prix.

After winning in Australia last weekend, Norris had been towing a fine line between admitting McLaren was the team to beat while also attempting to temper expectations of just how quick its car is.

Norris, whose team-mate Oscar Piastri will start the sprint from third, discussed on Thursday how the car does not suit his driving style, but in Shanghai it was two small mistakes on both runs that left him off the pace in sprint qualifying.

Read Also:

“I made a mistake – I locked up in the last corner,” he said. “But we’re just struggling a bit more now. Just not quick enough, simply. Struggling a lot with the car.

“It’s more on me rather than the car. I can’t make the car perfect. But, no, this was me just trying to just push a bit too much.

Lando Norris, McLaren

Lando Norris, McLaren

Photo by: Mark Thompson

“So [I] just need to back off a little bit and not try to push too much. I think the car’s still good and in a good window, maybe not good enough for pole. But we can definitely go forward.”

Norris pointed to the windy conditions across the Shanghai International Circuit as making the McLaren more difficult to drive.

“Our difficulties that we’ve been struggling with showed a lot more today, so nothing more than that, honestly. Just too many mistakes, it is just too difficult a car to drive,” he added.

“I think just throughout the day we’ve been struggling a bit with the front locking and struggling a lot in the last corner with all the tailwinds, so it is kind of a lot more aligned with Bahrain [pre-season testing]. Just a lot windier – when the wind’s blowing, then we struggle a lot more.

“So I think both myself and Oscar struggled more, clearly me more than him. So, yeah, just pushing a bit hard to try and make up for not quite being quick enough.”

Having looked by far the quickest squad, neither McLaren could hook up a fast enough lap in SQ3 as Lewis Hamilton took pole position for Ferrari with Red Bull’s Max Verstappen joining him on the front row.

Read Also:

Piastri bemoaned the strategy to run earlier than their rivals in SQ3 but is still hopeful of a strong showing in Saturday’s sprint race.

“I think we were probably quick at the wrong points of it, unfortunately,” he said.

Oscar Piastri, McLaren

Oscar Piastri, McLaren

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

“SQ1 and SQ2 felt good, and then SQ3, we tried something a bit different and went out much earlier and tried two laps, which I’m not sure was the best thing in the end, but I think it’s something we need to have a look at.

“I think the pace in the car is still very strong and I’m still confident to fight from third. It has been difficult, I think, with the track surface, it’s got a lot of grip, but it’s very peaky and it’s been pretty tough all day to just keep on top of the car.

“I honestly think we did a good job of trying to tame it for sprint qualifying, just maybe got the run plan a bit wrong.

“So it’s been an interesting challenge. The grip has been a lot better than last season, which is nice, and I think there’s some things we can do better tomorrow.”

In this article

Mark Mann-Bryans

Formula 1

Lando Norris

McLaren

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics