You dont have javascript enabled! Please enable it!

Both Ferrari drivers and Pierre Gasly are at risk of disqualification from the Chinese Grand Prix after their cars failed post-race technical checks.

Charles Leclerc and Gasly’s cars were found to weight 799 kilograms after post-race checks, including the removal of fuel, were performed. The minimum weight limit is set at 800kg.

Lewis Hamilton’s car failed a check of its rearmost skid, which is required to measure at least nine millimetres. Three measurements of of Hamilton’s skid at different points were less than this.

Representatives of Ferrari and Alpine have been summoned to meet the stewards.

The discrepancies were reported by FIA Formula 1 technical delegate Jo Bauer who has reported the matters to the stewards. The standard penalty for cars which fail technical checks is disqualification, as happened to George Russell in the Belgian Grand Prix last year, which he won before his car was found to be beneath the minimum weight limit.

Leclerc finished fifth in today’s race, Hamilton sixth and Gasly 11th. If all three drivers are disqualified, Lance Stroll will inherit ninth place and Carlos Sainz Jnr will move up to 10th.

Leclerc lost part of his front wing when he made contact with Lewis Hamilton at the start of the race. The stewards took this into account by comparing the weight of his damaged wing with that of a spare provided by Ferrari. The undamaged wing was 200 grams heavier.

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Technical delegate’s reports on Leclerc, Gasly and Hamilton’s cars

After the race, car number 16 [Leclerc] was weighed and its weight was 800.0 kg, which is the minimum weight required by TR Article 4.1. As the front wing was damaged (the missing FW endplate was recovered and weighed with the car), the car was re-weighed with an [official] spare front wing assembly of car 16 and its weight was 800.5 kg.

After this, fuel was drained out of the car and 2.0 litres of fuel were removed. The car was drained according to the draining procedure submitted by the team in their legality document. The car was weighed again on the FIA scales (with the [official] spare front wing assembly of car 16) and the weight was 799.0 kg. The calibration of the scales was confirmed and witnessed by the competitor. For information the spare front wing was 0.2 kg heavier than the damaged one used during the race.

As this is 1.0 kg below the minimum weight requested in TR Article 4.1, which also has to be respected at all times during the competition, I am referring this matter to the Stewards for their consideration.

After the race, car number 10 [Gasly] was weighed and its weight was 800.0 kg, which is the minimum weight required by TR Article 4.1. After this, a fuel mass check was carried out and 1.1 kg of fuel were removed. The car was drained according to the draining procedure submitted by the team in their legality document. The car was weighed again on the FIA scales and the weight was 799.0 kg. The calibration of the scales was confirmed and witnessed by the competitor.

As this is 1.0 kg below the minimum weight requested in TR Article 4.1, which also has to be respected at all times during the competition, I am referring this matter to the stewards for their consideration.

The skid wear of car number 44 was checked.

The rearmost skid was measured according to the team’s legality documents submission in accordance with TD039 L, item 1.2 b) i). Measurements were taken along the stiffness compliant area at three different points of the periphery (inner arc). The recorded measurement were 8.6mm (LHS), 8.6mm (car centerline) and 8.5mm (RHS).

As this is less than the 9 mm minimum thickness required by TR Article 3.5.9 e), I am referring this matter to the stewards for their consideration.

This article will be updated

Miss nothing from RaceFans

Get a daily email with all our latest stories – and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2025 Chinese Grand Prix

Browse all 2025 Chinese Grand Prix articles

Charles Leclerc has explained that the decision to soldier on with a broken front wing throughout the Chinese Grand Prix after contact with Lewis Hamilton was to preserve track position.

The two Ferraris made light contact at Turn 3 on the first lap as Hamilton tried to assume the apex line and clipped Leclerc, which knocked the endplate off his front wing.

Race engineer Bryan Bozzi told Leclerc that he was around “20-30 points of downforce” in arrears as a result of the clash, which the Monegasque reckoned he could deal with. As an estimate, this would lead to a time loss of around 0.2-0.3s per lap.

Leclerc’s pace appeared to defy the broken wing, and he chose to continue with it rather than prolong his pitstop.

His greater pace compared to Hamilton prompted Ferrari to swap its two drivers and let Leclerc run ahead to chase George Russell, and he got to within DRS range before a lock-up at Turn 14 called an end to his assault.

The front wing damage proved to be a thorn in Leclerc’s side, as his hard-compound front tyres started to degrade more heavily towards the end – which ultimately cost him in his battle for fourth with Max Verstappen.

“Of course we are speaking about a big [downforce] loss on my car, so there was for sure the potential to do a lot better,” Leclerc told Sky about the decision not to replace the wing.

“We didn’t want to take the eight seconds at the pitstop of changing the front wing, because then I will need to overtake cars and we were very weak in Turn 12.

“That was making us very vulnerable with the cars behind and it was very, very difficult to make any overtakes because on the way up to Turn 14 we were just too far off.

“I didn’t want to take that risk – I just wanted to keep track position and try to maximise the result.”

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

“Honestly, I think it wasn’t that quick,” Leclerc later added. “I mean, it felt really bad. I think we were generally quick, we’ve seen it yesterday with Lewis, myself we saw it towards the end of the sprint where I was very strong.

“All in all, I think we had a really good race car, and today I did a step with the car, and I think that made it a lot better for today.”

Leclerc refused to blame Hamilton for the incident, calling it a “racing incident”, and admitted neither driver expected to encounter each other into the corner.

Team principal Fred Vasseur explained that, although impressed by Leclerc’s pace on the broken front wing, the impact of electing not to change the wing was escalating.

“The positives are the pole of Lewis, the win of Lewis [in the sprint], and I would say the pace of Charles during the race with the front wing damage,” said Vasseur. “[With] the loss of downforce that we had, the pace was mega.

“And this is the positive of the weekend, but he struggled a bit on track at the end with the tyres because, with the loss of the front wing, it was much more difficult to manage.

“But at the end, overall we finished 20 seconds behind the McLaren with this damage. I think it’s a very good result and very strong result.”

Photos from Chinese GP – Race

In this article

Jake Boxall-Legge

Formula 1

Charles Leclerc

Ferrari

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Charles Leclerc has explained that the decision to soldier on with a broken front wing throughout the Chinese Grand Prix after contact with Lewis Hamilton was to preserve track position.

The two Ferraris made light contact at Turn 3 on the first lap as Hamilton tried to assume the apex line and clipped Leclerc, which knocked the endplate off his front wing.

Race engineer Bryan Bozzi told Leclerc that he was around “20-30 points of downforce” in arrears as a result of the clash, which the Monegasque reckoned he could deal with. As an estimate, this would lead to a time loss of around 0.2-0.3s per lap.

Leclerc’s pace appeared to defy the broken wing, and he chose to continue with it rather than prolong his pitstop.

His greater pace compared to Hamilton prompted Ferrari to swap its two drivers and let Leclerc run ahead to chase George Russell, and he got to within DRS range before a lock-up at Turn 14 called an end to his assault.

The front wing damage proved to be a thorn in Leclerc’s side, as his hard-compound front tyres started to degrade more heavily towards the end – which ultimately cost him in his battle for fourth with Max Verstappen.

“Of course we are speaking about a big [downforce] loss on my car, so there was for sure the potential to do a lot better,” Leclerc told Sky about the decision not to replace the wing.

“We didn’t want to take the eight seconds at the pitstop of changing the front wing, because then I will need to overtake cars and we were very weak in Turn 12.

“That was making us very vulnerable with the cars behind and it was very, very difficult to make any overtakes because on the way up to Turn 14 we were just too far off.

“I didn’t want to take that risk – I just wanted to keep track position and try to maximise the result.”

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

“Honestly, I think it wasn’t that quick,” Leclerc later added. “I mean it felt really bad. I think we were generally quick, we’ve seen it yesterday with Lewis, myself we saw it towards the end of the sprint where I was very strong.

“All in all, I think we had a really good race car and today I did a step with the car and I think that made it a lot better for today.”

Leclerc refused to blame Hamilton for the clash, calling it a “racing incident” and admitted neither driver expected to encounter each other into the corner.

Team principal Fred Vasseur explained that, although impressed by Leclerc’s pace on the broken front wing, the impact of electing not to change the wing was escalating.

“The positives are the pole of Lewis, the win of Lewis [in the sprint], and I would say the pace of Charles during the race with the front wing damage,” said Vasseur. “[With] the loss of downforce that we had, the pace was mega.

“And this is the positive of the weekend, but he struggled a bit on track at the end with the tyres because, with the loss of the front wing, it was much more difficult to manage.

“But at the end, overall we finished 20 seconds behind the McLaren with this damage. I think it’s a very good result and very strong result.”

In this article

Jake Boxall-Legge

Formula 1

Charles Leclerc

Ferrari

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Start, Shanghai International Circuit, 2025


Which Formula 1 driver made the most of the Chinese Grand Prix weekend?

It’s time to give your verdict on which driver did the best with the equipment at their disposal over the last three days.

Review how each driver got on below and vote for who impressed you the most at Shanghai International Circuit.

Driver performance summary

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Vote for your driver of the weekend

Which driver do you think did the best job throughout the race weekend?

Who got the most out of their car in qualifying and the race? Who put their team mate in the shade?

Cast your vote below and explain why you chose the driver you picked in the comments.

Who was the best driver of the 2025 Chinese Grand Prix weekend?

  • No opinion (0%)
  • Gabriel Bortoleto (0%)
  • Nico Hulkenberg (0%)
  • Carlos Sainz Jnr (0%)
  • Alexander Albon (1%)
  • Yuki Tsunoda (0%)
  • Isack Hadjar (2%)
  • Oliver Bearman (11%)
  • Esteban Ocon (8%)
  • Pierre Gasly (0%)
  • Jack Doohan (1%)
  • Fernando Alonso (0%)
  • Lance Stroll (0%)
  • George Russell (11%)
  • Andrea Kimi Antonelli (1%)
  • Liam Lawson (0%)
  • Max Verstappen (12%)
  • Lewis Hamilton (4%)
  • Charles Leclerc (1%)
  • Oscar Piastri (47%)
  • Lando Norris (1%)

Total Voters: 85

Loading ... Loading …

A RaceFans account is required in order to vote. If you do not have one, register an account here or read more about registering here
When this poll is closed the result will be displayed instead of the voting form.

2025 Chinese Grand Prix

Browse all 2025 Chinese Grand Prix articles

Debates and polls

Browse all debates and polls


Charles Leclerc believes Ferrari’s qualifying display is a true indication of its current Formula 1 performance levels, with Lewis Hamilton’s sprint race victory at the Chinese Grand Prix an outlier.

Hamilton sprung a surprise on Friday when he took pole position for the sprint, which he then converted into his first victory for Ferrari, having struggled during the opening race in Australia last week.

Despite enjoying a bigger winning margin than all but one of the sprint races from 2024, neither Hamilton nor Leclerc were able to replicate such a performance in qualifying for the grand prix.

Instead, Hamilton will start fifth with Leclerc alongside – the pair having started seventh and eighth in Melbourne with the order reversed.

Read Also:

However, after underperforming in Australia and Hamilton’s somewhat shock Shanghai sprint success, Leclerc feels Ferrari has now levelled out with its qualifying showing.

“This afternoon I think the potential was just not there,” he said.

“The overall grip was just not there, and I think in Australia I felt like we didn’t do a great job in qualifying, and we were further away than what we thought but, if we had put everything together, I think we were expecting to be three tenths off.

“I think these three tenths that we see today are generally where we are. Apart from [the fact that] Lewis did a great, great job yesterday, but I feel like today I did a good job. I’m sure Lewis did a good job as well and that’s the potential of the car.

“Is there a little bit more in the car? Maybe. Three tenths, I don’t think so. But we need to look forward to tomorrow.”

Leclerc started the sprint in fourth but finished a place further back, having been overtaken by George Russell and then struggled to find a way past the Mercedes as his tyres suffered.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

“This morning we had good pace in the car, especially towards the end of the stint, but being in dirty air is always trickier, so I had wished for a better quali,” Leclerc added.

“The tyre management looked good, but we need to be careful because, on my side, I was struggling a lot being in dirty air. Lewis had really good pace in free air. We just need to try and find free air from where we start.

“This is going to be a bit tricky because, starting P5 and P6, we’ve got quite a few cars in front, so to find free air is never easy. But we’ll try our best and hopefully our race pace is better than the guys around.”

Hamilton had entered qualifying hopeful of repeating his success from Friday but feels changes to the set-up left his Ferrari more difficult to drive.

“We started really optimistic naturally, but then we made just a couple of small changes, tweaks to the car, and it really put the car on a knife-edge,” he said.

“I think the wind picked up a little bit as well, so the car was just trickier today. It was harder to put laps together.

“You want a car that’s balanced. At the moment, from one corner to the next, the car has a different balance.

“You just want a car that you can rely on. When you attack the corners, you know it’s going to stay with you instead of lock up and go on or snap into oversteer and, when it’s unpredictable, then you’ve got no hope.”

Photos from Chinese GP – Sprint Race & Qualifying

 

In this article

Mark Mann-Bryans

Formula 1

Lewis Hamilton

Charles Leclerc

Ferrari

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Charles Leclerc believes Ferrari’s qualifying display is a true indication of its current Formula 1 performance levels, with Lewis Hamilton’s sprint race victory at the Chinese Grand Prix an outlier.

Hamilton sprung a surprise on Friday when he took pole position for the sprint, which he then converted into victory for his first win for Ferrari, having struggled during the opening race in Australia last week.

Despite enjoying a bigger winning margin than all but one of the 2024 sprint races, neither Hamilton nor Leclerc were able to replicate such a performance in qualifying for the grand prix.

Instead, Hamilton will start fifth with Leclerc alongside – the pair having started seventh and eighth in Melbourne with the order reversed.

However, after underperforming in Australia and Hamilton’s somewhat shock Shanghai sprint success, Leclerc feels Ferrari has now levelled out with its qualifying showing.

“This afternoon I think the potential was just not there,” he said.

“The overall grip was just not there, and I think in Australia I felt like we didn’t do a great job in qualifying, and we were further away than what we thought but, if we had put everything together, I think we were expecting to be three tenths off.

“I think these three tenths that we see today are generally where we are. Apart from Lewis did a great, great job yesterday, but I feel like today I did a good job. I’m sure Lewis did a good job as well and that’s the potential of the car.

“Is there a little bit more in the car? Maybe. Three tenths, I don’t think so. But we need to look forward to tomorrow.”

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari

Photo by: Kym Illman

Leclerc started the sprint in fourth but finished a place further back having been overtaken by George Russell and then struggling to find a way past the Mercedes as his tyres suffered.

“This morning we had good pace in the car, especially towards the end of the stint but being in dirty air is always trickier, so I had wished for a better quali,” Leclerc added.

“The tyre management looked good, but we need to be careful because, on my side, I was struggling a lot being in dirty air. Lewis had really good pace in free air. We just need to try and find free air from where we start.

“This is going to be a bit tricky because, starting P5 and P6, we’ve got quite a few cars in front, so to find free air is never easy. But we’ll try our best and hopefully our race pace is better than the guys around.”

Hamilton had entered qualifying hopeful of repeating his success from Friday but felt changes to the set-up left his Ferrari more difficult to drive.

“We started really optimistic naturally, but then we made just a couple of small changes, tweaks to the car, and it really put the car on a knife edge,” he said.

“I think the wind picked up a little bit as well, so the car was just trickier today. It was harder to put laps together.

“You want a car that’s balanced. At the moment, from one corner to the next, the car has a different balance.

“You just want a car that you can rely on. When you attack the corners, you know it’s going to stay with you instead of lock-up and go on or snap into oversteer and, when it’s unpredictable, then you’ve got no hope.”

In this article

Mark Mann-Bryans

Formula 1

Lewis Hamilton

Charles Leclerc

Ferrari

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Charles Leclerc seemed put out during today’s sprint race qualifying session when Ferrari instructed him to let him team mate past.

“Swap the cars now?” Leclerc reacted in surprise after receiving the order to let Lewis Hamilton by from race engineer Bryan Bozzi.

“I’ll do it, but we’ve never done that,” he replied, adding, “and I’m a bit in the shit as well.”

However Ferrari appear to have given Leclerc the instruction during SQ2 not because of some new policy on how they co-ordinate their drivers, but in response to an unusual sequence of events.

Hamilton left the pits to start his SQ2 run with Leclerc behind him. The pair circulated in that order and began their first attempts to set a time.

Leclerc then made a mistake at turn six and aborted his attempt to set a time. Had he completed that lap he would have used the next lap to cool his tyres back down. Instead he asked race engineer Bryan Bozzi if he could cool his tyres on the current lap and then begin another attempt at a push lap:

Bozzi (to Leclerc)It will be mode push before last corner.
Leclerc runs wide at turn six and backs off
BozziNo one pushing behind.
Leclerc‘Can we do a ‘push-cool-push’?
Bozzi‘Yes, we can do a ‘push-cool-push’. So we push after this lap.

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Hamilton pressed on and completed his lap, though the eventual pole-winner did not set a particularly competitive time. He then began his cool-down lap. The two Ferrari drivers were now out of phase.

Adami (to Hamilton)And P3. Norris did a 31.1
BozziSo Norris P1, 31.1. Hamilton mistake, 32.2.
HamiltonLooked quite windy on that lap.
AdamiUnderstood. We are staying out.
Hamilton‘Too fast out-lap?
BozziAnd it will be charge off into last corner.
Leclerc begins another push lap
Adami‘Piastri pushing behind, 10 seconds. Out-lap was good for our metrics. Two tenths… one tenth, sorry, one tenth sector one to Lando. And Piastri pushing behind, six seconds.

Hamilton reported he was having difficulty cooling his tyres down. Ferrari told him not to pit, so he prepared to continue onto a second consecutive cool-down lap. Meanwhile Leclerc, now pushing, was catching him:

AdamiSo, Charles has aborted, for info. Piastri two behind.
HamiltonYou said we’re staying out?
AdamiYeah, prefer to stay out for traffic. Charles is pushing behind.
HamiltonVery hard to get the temps down.
AdamiCopy, understood. Charles is pushing behind, 10 seconds.
AdamiAnd radio still open.
Adami‘Charles pushing behind, four seconds. Charles approaching, watch your mirrors and cooling down on the straight. Reset your b-mig.

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Hamilton pulled over to let Leclerc by as they came out of the final corner. Leclerc passed him as they approached the line and backed off. With Hamilton starting his second cool-down lap, they were back in phase, but now Leclerc was running close in front of Hamilton.

As Hamilton pointed out, this created a problem for him. Running ahead can confer an advantage on a driver and teams usually rotate this privilege between drivers. Ferrari asked Hamilton if he wanted to run ahead, and he asked to:

BozziAnd we go for a single cool, single cool.
AdamiWhat’s going on? Has the wind changed?
HamiltonCharles is just ahead of me. Is he going the next lap, or…
BozziThe wind is gusty but not big change in terms of direction.
AdamiHe is going again next lap. Behind phase also car behind, no pressure from behind.
HamiltonYeah, but I’ve not got a gap.
AdamiDo you want to swap cars, question?
HamiltonYeah, that’s where I’m supposed to be.

Leclerc was therefore surprised to get an instruction to swap places. As he was still struggling with his tyre temperatures, it added to his problems, though both drivers successfully proceeded to SQ3:

Bozzi‘Diff mid plus one for turns one-two.
LeclercFor everywhere I think it’s very, very tricky now.
BozziAnd can we swap the cars please?
LeclercSwap the cars now?
BozziYes, please.
LeclercYeah, I’ll do it, but we’ve never done that and I’m a bit in the shit as well, so…
Leclerc lets Hamilton past at the exit of turn 10

Leclerc, however, is now under investigation for potentially driving too slowly during SQ2 and it remains to be seen whether Ferrari’s instruction contributed to that.

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Miss nothing from RaceFans

Get a daily email with all our latest stories – and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:

2025 Chinese Grand Prix

Browse all 2025 Chinese Grand Prix articles

Charles Leclerc and Lance Stroll have avoided grid penalties after being investigated by stewards following Friday’s sprint race qualifying session in Shanghai.

The pair were under investigation for failing to obey the maximum delta time between the Safety Car lines during the sprint race qualifying session. Both incidents occured during the second stage of the session.

The race director’s guidance for the Chinese Grand Prix states: “For the safe and orderly conduct of the event, other than in exceptional circumstances accepted as such by the stewards, any driver that exceeds the maximum time from the Second Safety Car Line to the First Safety Car Line on any lap during and after the end of the sprint qualifying and qualifying session, including in-laps and out-laps or during reconnaissance laps when the pit exit is opened for the sprint or race, may be deemed to be going unnecessarily slowly.”

Drivers are routinely noted for failing to adhere to this guidance during qualifying sessions, but the stewards typically note they had no alternative but to breach the maximum time as they had to slow down to let other cars past.

Leclerc was cleared as the stewards ruled he backed off after being told to let Lewis Hamilton past by his team. His race engineer Bryan Bozzi told him during SQ2: “Can we swap the cars, please?” After checking the order Leclerc replied: “I’ll do it but we’ve never done that and I’m in the shit here.”

After speaking to Leclerc and a Ferrari representative, the stewards determined he did not drive “unnecessarily slowly.”

“Both [Leclerc] and [Hamilton] commenced their preparation laps close to each other,” they noted. “Hamilton followed Leclerc closely and Leclerc had [Stroll] ahead of him on a preparatory lap. Leclerc had to wait for [Stroll] to commence his push lap and in the meantime, Leclerc was overtaken by Hamilton on the orders of the team.

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

“Leclerc at all times maintained a reasonable speed and ultimately sought to create a reasonable gap behind Hamilton. All of this was done in an orderly fashion and no car behind Leclerc was affected by this. Therefore, Leclerc did not impede other drivers and gained no sporting advantage by his course of action.

“The stewards therefore determine that Leclerc did not drive “unnecessarily slowly”, and that evidently the reason he was above the maximum time was due to his appropriate actions and take no further action.”

The stewards ruled Stroll only exceeded the time limit because Lando Norris overtook him during his lap, and the Aston Martin driver backed off in order to ensure he had a sufficient gap ahead of him.

“When [Stroll] commenced a preparation lap, he was overtaken by [Norris] who was completing a push lap,” the stewards explained. “Stroll followed Norris at a reasonable speed and then overtook Norris.

“While Stroll continued to drive at a reasonable speed, he was overtaken by Norris between turns 10 and 11. Stroll explained that his push lap would have been compromised if he had not then slowed to create a reasonable gap behind Norris. He explained that in the circumstances he considered the best course was to stay behind Norris maintaining a reasonable distance. Having done so, Stroll exceeded the delta
time by approximately six seconds.

“The evidence showed that Stroll stayed at or above speeds necessary to stay below 1:54.0 around the vast majority of the circuit. In this case Stroll’s ability to stay below 1:54.0 was compromised by NOR’s overtake. No car behind Stroll was affected because the two cars following Stroll were on in-laps. Therefore, Stroll did not impede other drivers and gained no sporting advantage.

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

“Stroll maintained a reasonable distance of Norris. The stewards therefore determine that Stroll did not drive ‘unnecessarily slowly’, and that evidently the reason he was above the maximum time was due to his appropriate actions and take no further action.”

In both cases the stewards noted neither driver delayed a rival while also exceeded the maximum time limit. This was a bone of contention at the Qatar Grand Prix last year, when the stewards gave Max Verstappen a one-place grid penalty for exceeding the delta time and obstructing George Russell as they prepared to start laps.

The maximum time between the Safety Car lines is set at one minute and 54 seconds for this event. The stewards confirmed there were eight other cases of drivers failing to adhere to it during sprint race qualifying which did not require investigation. Two more of these involved Stroll again and Oscar Piastri also committed two. Tsunoda, Esteban Ocon, Liam Lawson and Andrea Kimi Antonelli were the other drivers who escaped penalties for driving too slowly.

Miss nothing from RaceFans

Get a daily email with all our latest stories – and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2025 Chinese Grand Prix

Browse all 2025 Chinese Grand Prix articles

Until Lewis Hamilton landed at Maranello this past January, Charles Leclerc was widely seen as the cornerstone of the Scuderia’s project. The Monegasque driver joined the Ferrari Driver Academy in 2016, two years before making a low-key Formula 1 debut in 2018 with Sauber.

Similarly, Francesco ‘Pecco’ Bagnaia started in MotoGP with a satellite team (Pramac) before donning Ducati’s red colours in 2021 and claiming back-to-back world titles in 2022 and 2023. Those two championships naturally cemented his status as the de facto leader of the most competitive team on the grid.

However, Marc Marquez’s arrival has challenged that hierarchy. Just as Hamilton’s move to Ferrari has done with Leclerc.

An Italian MotoGP champion riding a Bologna-built machine is the perfect narrative from an Italian perspective – just as it would be if the Maranello-based team were to celebrate another title, nearly two decades later, with Il Predestinato (as Leclerc is known), even though he races under the Monegasque flag.

Can Lewis Hamilton get the upper hand on Charles Leclerc in 2025?

Can Lewis Hamilton get the upper hand on Charles Leclerc in 2025?

Photo by: Ferrari

The differences in career achievements between Hamilton and his new team-mate are even more striking than those between Marquez and Bagnaia. The Briton’s seven titles place him on the same level as Michael Schumacher, whom he has already surpassed in wins (105 to 91), podiums (202 to 195) and pole positions (104 to 68). Leclerc, 11 seasons younger, has just eight wins, 43 podiums, and 26 poles. The gap between Marquez (six MotoGP titles) and Bagnaia (two) is smaller in comparison.

That’s just the sporting aspect. In terms of media impact, the gap between the arriving legends and the incumbents is much wider. Hamilton’s popularity makes him a global icon far beyond racing. On social media, the numbers speak for themselves: Hamilton’s Instagram profile boasts 39.2 million followers – more than twice Leclerc’s 17.8 million. Proportionally, the disparity between Marquez (7.4 million) and Bagnaia (1.7 million) is even greater.

On track, the balance within Ferrari remains even – at least for now. After a rain-affected race in Australia, where Leclerc finished eighth and Hamilton 10th, the dynamic between the two remains peaceful.

Read Also:

Ducati, however, already has a clear winner and loser. Marquez’s debut as a factory rider could not have been better: two perfect weekends in Thailand and Argentina, winning both the sprint and the main races, taking the pole positions and setting the fastest laps. None of this was surprising after his strong pre-season, where he dominated headlines during testing in Malaysia and Buriram – as well as at MotoGP’s official launch event in Bangkok.

Marquez has long been regarded as the smartest rider on the grid, combining talent, bravery and emotional intelligence. His influence is already being compared to that of Valentino Rossi. Just three months into his tenure at Ducati, he has won over the key figures within the team – from CEO Claudio Domenicali to general manager Gigi Dall’Igna, as well as the engineers, technicians and mechanics fine-tuning his Desmosedici.

“We already knew Marquez the rider – he’s a phenomenon. But we’ve now discovered Marc the person, and he’s even more exceptional,” a Ducati team member told Motorsport.com. Then, taking a dig at the recent past, they added: “In just a couple of races, he has thanked us for our work more times than the previous rider did in two years.”

Marquez's gratitude has not gone unnoticed at Ducati

Marquez’s gratitude has not gone unnoticed at Ducati

Photo by: Ducati Corse

Dall’Igna played a key role in Marquez’s signing, prioritising building the strongest team in MotoGP history over any concerns about managing two alpha riders. “It’s up to us to prove how good we are,” he often repeats. Meanwhile, Ducati insiders praise Bagnaia’s professionalism. “Pecco is a true gentleman – from the moment he knew Marc was coming, he accepted it without any complaints,” a team member confided.

However, Marquez’s dominant performances in Thailand and Argentina have left Bagnaia without an immediate response. He has handled his current struggles with apparent dignity and composure, staying true to his reputation. But how long can he maintain his cool if the gap to Marquez continues to grow?

In less than two weeks, MotoGP will head to Austin, arguably Marquez’s strongest circuit – he has won there seven times in the premier class. If he secures another double victory, he will arrive in Qatar for round four with at least a 39-point lead over Bagnaia. That would be a real test of the Italian’s resilience.

In this article

Oriol Puigdemont

Formula 1

MotoGP

Lewis Hamilton

Marc Marquez

Francesco Bagnaia

Charles Leclerc

Ducati Team

Scuderia Ferrari

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Start, Albert Park, 2025


Which Formula 1 driver made the most of the Australian Grand Prix weekend?

It’s time to give your verdict on which driver did the best with the equipment at their disposal over the last three days.

Review how each driver got on below and vote for who impressed you the most at Albert Park.

Driver performance summary

| Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Vote for your driver of the weekend

Which driver do you think did the best job throughout the race weekend?

Who got the most out of their car in qualifying and the race? Who put their team mate in the shade?

Cast your vote below and explain why you chose the driver you picked in the comments.

Who was the best driver of the 2025 Australian Grand Prix weekend?

  • No opinion (0%)
  • Gabriel Bortoleto (1%)
  • Nico Hulkenberg (6%)
  • Carlos Sainz Jnr (0%)
  • Alexander Albon (10%)
  • Yuki Tsunoda (1%)
  • Isack Hadjar (4%)
  • Oliver Bearman (0%)
  • Esteban Ocon (0%)
  • Pierre Gasly (0%)
  • Jack Doohan (1%)
  • Fernando Alonso (0%)
  • Lance Stroll (1%)
  • George Russell (2%)
  • Andrea Kimi Antonelli (19%)
  • Liam Lawson (0%)
  • Max Verstappen (8%)
  • Lewis Hamilton (1%)
  • Charles Leclerc (0%)
  • Oscar Piastri (2%)
  • Lando Norris (42%)

Total Voters: 83

Loading ... Loading …

A RaceFans account is required in order to vote. If you do not have one, register an account here or read more about registering here
When this poll is closed the result will be displayed instead of the voting form.

2025 Australian Grand Prix

Browse all 2025 Australian Grand Prix articles

Debates and polls

Browse all debates and polls